Reach Out to Us!
- Home
- Why Some Homes Need To Be Repiped – Polybutylene
Polybutylene, a type of plastic resin, was developed as a new material for the chemical industry due to its excellent chemical resistance and mold-ability into various shapes. Giulio Natta, 1963 winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his work on high density polymers, synthesized polybutylene in 1954 as a part of his research into the use of Ziegler–Natta catalyst. Industrial production would not begin for another decade and began in Germany. 1968 was the first year of polybutylene production in the United States by the Mobile Oil Company. A series of mergers and acquisitions in the 1970s resulted in Shell Chemical – a Shell Oil subsidiary – taking over polybutylene resin production in the United States and investing heavily in increasing production.
Shell Chemical then started a large scale marketing campaign to push polybutylene for all sorts of use cases including insulation, flexible packaging, adhesives and plumbing. For plumbing, polybutylene pipe was the leading product in a new wave of non-metal piping. At the time copper pipe was the industry standard, given its long life compared to galvanized pipe and its lower weight and lack of toxicity compared to lead. Where as copper has to be mined then processed, and has high demand across many industries, polybutylene and other polymer based piping materials are essentially processed waste products from the energy sector. As such the price of polybutylene pipe was a fraction of copper pipe.
Marketing for polybutylene pipe declared it was the pipe of the future and even claimed it was less prone to failure than alternatives. The claim was that polybutylene was flexible so it could accommodate freezing water without bursting and that it did not corrode like lead, copper and galvanized pipe. This new pipe quickly gained traction due to its lower cost, flexibility, and ease of installation compared to copper. These attributes made polybutylene an attractive option for builders and developers, particularly in the rapidly expanding housing markets of the Sunbelt states, where the savings boosted profits. Other polymer piping materials did not gain traction as quickly due to that massive lead shell gave polybutylene in production and marketing.
Within just a few years polybutylene pipes began to leak, with the earliest related to the leaks coming just 4 years after initial installation in 1981. Unfortunately the early lawsuits incorrectly went after contractors rather than the manufacturer. Even as increasing evidence of issues with polybutylene pipe continued for flow in, efforts by the manufacturer and dealers to market the product as top of line and better thannalternatives continued. The pattern of homes with leaks compared to homes withoutnleaks indicated what was actually causing the pipe failures. Homes with untreated wellnwater were mostly free of leaks in the early years, while most leaking polybutylene wasnfound in homes on city water treated with chlorine. Though, eventually leaks would show up in all homes with polybutylene. A 1-800 number was set up by US Brass – the main manufacturer of fittings for polybutylene pipe – with support from Shell Chemical and Hoechst Celanese in 1988 as the first serious acknowledgment of the problems inherent to the material.
As the number of complaints and lawsuits grew, the legal landscape became increasingly complex. In 1993, a nationwide class action lawsuit was filed in Houston, aiming to address the widespread failures of polybutylene plumbing systems comprehensively. This class action brought together thousands of homeowners under a single legal umbrella, amplifying their collective voice against the manufacturers. The defendants were accused of negligence, defective design, and failure to warn consumers about the potential risks associated with polybutylene pipes .
The class action lawsuit represented a significant escalation in the legal battle, requiring extensive coordination and legal maneuvering. The plaintiffs’ legal teams worked tirelessly to gather evidence, secure expert testimony, and navigate the intricate processes of class action litigation. The sheer scale of the lawsuit underscored the severity of the issue, with thousands of homeowners across the country reporting similar problems with their polybutylene plumbing systems.
In 1995, a landmark settlement was reached, resulting in the establishment of a $950 million fund to compensate affected homeowners. This settlement was one of the largest of its kind and provided a lifeline to many who had suffered significant financial losses due to pipe failures. The settlement terms required the defendants to cover the costs of replacing faulty polybutylene pipes and repairing the resultant damage. Homeowners had until 2009 to file claims and access these funds, offering a window of relief amidst ongoing concerns about the reliability of their plumbing systems. Unfortunately, many homeowners did not even learn of the settlement in time to access funds.
Despite the substantial settlement, the legal battles did not end there. The complexities of the settlement process, coupled with ongoing reports of polybutylene pipe failures, meant that new cases and legal challenges continued to emerge. Some homeowners faced difficulties accessing the settlement funds due to procedural hurdles or issues with claim validation. At the time of the writing of this article, homeowners who wish to seek compensation may still contact lawyers about their options, but often they are left with no opportunity for financial recourse.
Why Polybutylene Pipes Fail
The primary reasons polybutylene pipes fail is their poor oxidative stability, especially when exposed to chlorine. Polybutylene contains tertiary C-H bonds along its polymer chain, which are highly reactive to oxidation. When chlorine, a common disinfectant in municipal water supplies, comes into contact with these bonds, it causes the polybutylene to degrade and become brittle. This degradation is accelerated in hot water, leading to cracks and leaks over time. The inherent molecular structure of polybutylene makes it particularly vulnerable to this type of chemical attack, compromising its reliability as a plumbing material. Manufacturers of polybutylene have been aware of this problematic feature since the earliest leaks. Wanting to save their flagship product, they began adding antioxidants to their pipes and advertised that this fixed the problem. Fundamentally this was a temporary fix, as antioxidants work by being a sacrificial element in the pipe, oxidizing so that the polybutylene does not. Over time, the antioxidants are depleted, leaving the pipes vulnerable to rapid degradation.
The problems with polybutylene were not limited to chemical degradation. The material’s crystallization behavior added another layer of complexity. When polybutylene is processed, it forms a metastable crystalline phase, which eventually transforms into a more stable form over time. This transition is never uniform throughout the material. Polybutylene is a polymorphic polymer, meaning it can exist in different crystalline forms. The presence of multiple crystalline states within a single pipe introduced weak points, making the material less resistant to stress and more likely to fail.
The reliability of polybutylene pipes was further compromised by manufacturing and installation defects. Poor quality control during production led to pipes with hidden flaws, such as voids and inconsistent crystallinity. Additionally, improper installation techniques introduced stresses that accelerated the material’s degradation. Over-tightening fittings or incorrect joining methods exacerbated the inherent weaknesses of polybutylene, leading to premature failures.
The Ongoing Legacy of Polybutylene Pipes: Challenges for Homeowners
For many homeowners, the presence of polybutylene pipes in their homes represents a ticking time bomb. These pipes are notorious for their tendency to fail catastrophically, often without any warning. Unlike other plumbing materials that might show signs of wear and tear, polybutylene pipes can suddenly burst, leading to severe water damage. The unpredictability of these failures adds a layer of anxiety and uncertainty for those living in homes equipped with this problematic material.
Homeowners have reported incidents where pipes burst unexpectedly, causing extensive flooding and significant water damage to their properties. These failures often lead to the destruction of personal belongings, structural damage to homes, and costly repairs. The emotional and financial toll on homeowners can be substantial, as they deal with the immediate aftermath and long-term consequences of these plumbing disasters.
One of the most concerning aspects of polybutylene pipes is their lack of warning signs before failure. Unlike other plumbing materials that might exhibit leaks or visible deterioration, polybutylene pipes often fail without any prior indication. Homeowners may not realize there is a problem until it is too late, resulting in unexpected and severe water damage. This unpredictability makes it challenging for homeowners to take preventative measures and protect their properties. Testing for potential leaks in polybutylene pipe is also not a reasonable possibility. Destructive pressure testing of a plumbing system is the most reliable approach, but should the system fail the test, it is destroyed and the house is left without plumbing until new pipe can be installed. Nondestructive methods are only effective at identifying some failure conditions of polybutylene, such as cracking at joints and ablated sections of pipe. More so, Nondestructive testing methods are more invasive to homes than replacing the pipe would be, eliminating the approach as a reasonable measure for homeowners.
Given the risks associated with polybutylene pipes, replacement is often the best course of action. However, replacing an entire plumbing system can be a daunting and expensive task. Homeowners must navigate the complexities of identifying polybutylene pipes, finding qualified contractors, and financing the replacement. Despite these challenges, the long-term benefits of replacing polybutylene pipes with more reliable materials far outweigh the potential costs and damages of leaving them in place. For homeowners looking to replace their polybutylene pipes, PEX (cross-linked polyethylene) is a recommended alternative. PEX pipes offer several advantages over polybutylene, including greater flexibility, resistance to chemical degradation, and a longer lifespan. PEX pipes are designed to last up to 50 years and typically come with a 25-year warranty, providing homeowners with peace of mind and a reliable plumbing solution. Transitioning to PEX can mitigate the risks associated with polybutylene and protect homes from future plumbing failures.
PEX pipes boast a molecular structure that is highly resistant to chemical degradation, including chlorine. Unlike polybutylene, PEX does not contain the reactive tertiary C-H bonds, making it less prone to oxidative embrittlement. This fundamental difference in chemical stability ensures that PEX pipes have a longer lifespan and greater reliability in various water conditions. The cross-linking process used to manufacture PEX pipes results in a uniform structure that provides consistent performance across the entire length of the pipe. PEX can withstand higher temperatures and pressures without degrading, making it suitable for both hot and cold water systems. This durability and consistency have made PEX the material of choice for modern plumbing applications, offering a stark contrast to the unpredictable performance of polybutylene. PEX pipes are not only more reliable but also easier to install and maintain. Their flexibility allows for installation with fewer fittings and connections, reducing potential leak points. PEX can be bent around corners without the need for elbow joints, simplifying the installation process and saving time. Additionally, PEX’s resistance to scale and corrosion minimizes maintenance requirements, ensuring a long-lasting and trouble-free plumbing system.
Summary and Action Steps for Homeowners with Polybutylene Pipes
Quick Summary
Polybutylene pipes, once marketed as a revolutionary plumbing material, have proven to be highly problematic due to their tendency to fail under certain conditions. These failures are primarily caused by the material’s poor resistance to oxidative degradation, especially when exposed to chlorine in municipal water supplies. The molecular structure of polybutylene, along with manufacturing and installation defects, further exacerbates these issues, leading to sudden and catastrophic pipe bursts that can cause extensive water damage.
Select Service
Why Polybutylene Pipes Fail
1. Chlorine Degradation: Polybutylene reacts with chlorine, causing the pipes to become brittle and prone to cracking.
2. Variable Crystallization: Inconsistent crystallization within the pipes creates weak points that are more likely to fail under stress.
3. Manufacturing Defects: Poor quality control can result in pipes with hidden flaws, such as voids and inconsistent crystallinity.
4. Installation Issues: Improper installation techniques can introduce stresses that accelerate the degradation of polybutylene pipes.
1. Chemical Resistance: PEX pipes do not have the same reactive bonds as polybutylene, making them resistant to chlorine degradation.
2. Uniform Structure: The cross-linking process of PEX results in a uniform structure, providing consistent performance and durability.
3. Flexibility and Installation: PEX is flexible, easy to install, and requires fewer fittings, reducing potential leak points.
4. Long Lifespan: PEX pipes are designed to last up to 50 years and typically come with a 25-year warranty.
1. Identify Polybutylene Pipes: Check your home’s plumbing to see if you have polybutylene pipes. These pipes are usually gray and may have “PB” marked on them.
2. Consult a Professional: If you suspect you have polybutylene pipes, contact a licensed plumber to confirm and assess the condition of your plumbing system.
3. Plan for Replacement: Given the risks associated with polybutylene, replacing these pipes is often the best course of action. Discuss replacement options with your plumber.
4. Choose PEX Pipes: Consider replacing polybutylene pipes with PEX. This material offers greater reliability and a longer lifespan.
5. Get Quotes and Financing: Obtain quotes from qualified contractors and explore financing options to manage the cost of replacing your plumbing system.
6. Schedule Replacement: Once you have selected a contractor and secured financing, schedule the replacement of your polybutylene pipes to prevent potential water damage.
Conclusion
Polybutylene pipes pose a significant risk to homeowners due to their propensity for sudden and catastrophic failure. By taking proactive steps to identify and replace these pipes with PEX, homeowners can ensure the safety and reliability of their plumbing systems, avoiding costly repairs and water damage.
Consult with a professional plumber to evaluate your options and protect your home.
